Skip to content
Saturday, 14 November 2026
Explainer Politics Explained

Iran’s Leader Said No Talks With the US Under Pressure: What Happened Next, From 2025 to the War of 2026

In March 2025 Iran's supreme leader rejected an American offer of nuclear talks. Within a month the talks had begun anyway. Within a year he was dead and the two countries were at war, with Pakistan trying to mediate. This plain-English guide follows the story from that speech to October 2026.

ShareWhatsAppFacebookX

About this article: It was prepared with the help of AI tools from public sources and is being reviewed by our editors. If you spot an error, please let us know so that we can correct it.

⚡ The short answer

On 12 March 2025 Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, dismissed an offer of talks from President Donald Trump, saying that negotiating under threats would only tighten the sanctions on his country. A month later Iran was negotiating all the same. Those talks failed. In June 2025 Israel and then the United States bombed Iran’s nuclear sites. In February 2026 they struck again, on a far larger scale, and Ayatollah Khamenei was killed. A war followed that closed the Gulf’s main shipping lane and shook the world economy. Pakistan hosted the peace talks. A deal signed in June 2026 broke down within weeks, and the conflict was unresolved when this article was written.

  • ✅ March 2025: Khamenei rejects talks under pressure
  • ✅ April to May 2025: talks held anyway, through Oman
  • ⚠️ June 2025: twelve-day war; nuclear sites bombed
  • ⚠️ 28 February 2026: war begins; Khamenei killed
  • ✅ April 2026: Pakistan hosts US-Iran talks in Islamabad
📋 The story in dates
The speech 12 March 2025, Tehran
First US-Iran talks 12 April 2025, Oman
Twelve-day war 13 to 24 June 2025
UN sanctions restored 28 September 2025
Second war begins 28 February 2026
Ayatollah Khamenei Born 1939; supreme leader from 1989; killed 28 February 2026
His successor His son, Mojtaba Khamenei, chosen 8 March 2026
First ceasefire Early April 2026
Islamabad Talks 11 and 12 April 2026
Memorandum signed 17 June 2026
Memorandum breaks down From 7 July 2026

The speech

The news report this page once carried was about a few sentences spoken in Tehran.

On 12 March 2025 Ayatollah Khamenei met a gathering of university students, as he did each year. A few days earlier President Trump had said publicly that he had written to Iran’s leader proposing talks on its nuclear programme, and that Iran could be dealt with in one of two ways: by a deal or by force. The letter was carried to Tehran by an envoy from the United Arab Emirates and arrived the same day as the speech.

The ayatollah’s answer, as reported, had three parts.

  • The offer was a deception, meant to make Iran look like the side refusing peace.
  • The United States could not be trusted to keep an agreement, having abandoned the last one.
  • Talking under threat would tighten the knot of sanctions, not loosen it.

He added that he had not yet seen the letter himself.

He said no in March and his diplomats sat down in April. In Iran, as elsewhere, a leader’s public refusal is often the opening position, not the last word.

Why he said it

To understand the refusal, you need the ten years before it.

Year Event
2015 Iran and six world powers sign a nuclear agreement. Iran limits its nuclear work; sanctions are lifted
2018 President Trump, in his first term, withdraws the United States from the agreement and restores sanctions, a policy he calls “maximum pressure”
2019 onwards Iran, in response, enriches uranium to higher and higher levels
2021 to 2024 Efforts to revive the agreement fail
2023 to 2024 War in Gaza; Israel and Iran exchange direct strikes for the first time
January 2025 Mr Trump returns to office and restores “maximum pressure”

From Tehran’s point of view the lesson was plain. It had made a deal, kept it by the inspectors’ own account, and been punished anyway. Why would a second deal with the same president be different?

From Washington’s point of view, Iran had since built a stock of enriched uranium that had no civilian purpose, and was closer to a bomb than ever.

💡 Tip: what “enrichment” means and why the percentages matter

Natural uranium cannot fuel a reactor or a bomb. It must be enriched, which means raising the share of one particular form of the metal. Power stations need about 4 per cent. A weapon needs about 90 per cent. The 2015 agreement held Iran below 4 per cent. By 2025 it was producing uranium at 60 per cent, a level with no ordinary civilian use and a short step from weapons grade. Iran has always said it does not seek a bomb. That gap between what it said and what it stockpiled is what the whole dispute was about.

2025: talks, then war

Spring: the talks happen after all

A month after the speech, on 12 April 2025, an American envoy and Iran’s foreign minister met in Oman, through Omani mediators. Further rounds followed in Rome and Muscat. For a few weeks both sides spoke of progress.

The sticking point never moved. The United States came to insist that Iran give up enrichment entirely. Iran said enrichment on its own soil was a right it would not surrender.

Mr Trump’s letter had set a deadline of about two months. It passed.

June: the twelve-day war

On 13 June 2025 Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran’s nuclear sites, air defences and military leadership, killing senior commanders and scientists. Iran replied with waves of missiles and drones. On 22 June the United States joined in, bombing three nuclear sites. Iran fired at an American base in Qatar. A ceasefire took hold on 24 June.

Iran broke off the talks and stopped co-operating with the international nuclear inspectors.

Autumn: sanctions return

In late August Britain, France and Germany set in motion the clause of the 2015 agreement that restores United Nations sanctions if Iran breaks its terms. On 28 September 2025 those sanctions came back into force, over the objections of Russia and China.

By the end of 2025 there was no agreement, no inspection and no negotiation.

2026: the larger war

January and February: one more try

After large protests inside Iran at the turn of the year, and with an American military build-up in the region under way, contacts resumed through Oman. A round in Geneva on 26 February 2026 ended with both sides speaking of progress.

28 February: the strikes

Two days later the United States and Israel launched hundreds of air strikes across Iran. Among those killed on the first day was Ayatollah Khamenei, who had led the country for nearly thirty-seven years.

The body of senior clerics that chooses Iran’s leader named his son, Mojtaba Khamenei, as successor on 8 March.

March: the strait

Iran struck back at Israel, at American bases and at Gulf states that host them. Most consequentially, it closed the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow passage through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil normally sails. Oil and gas prices leapt. Several Gulf states were drawn into the fighting.

April: Islamabad

A two-week ceasefire was announced in early April, on a proposal brokered by Pakistan. Talks followed in Islamabad on 11 and 12 April.

United States Iran Pakistan (host)
Led by The vice-president The speaker of parliament, with the foreign minister The prime minister, the army chief and the foreign minister

They lasted about twenty-one hours over two days. The two sides are reported to have agreed on most points but not on the two that mattered: the strait and the nuclear programme. No agreement was signed. The United States then imposed its own naval blockade on Iranian ports.

June: a memorandum

Contacts continued, with Pakistan and Qatar as go-betweens. On 17 June 2026 the two presidents signed a memorandum of understanding: a halt to strikes, the reopening of the strait, an end to the blockade and sixty days to negotiate a final settlement. The nuclear question was left for those sixty days.

July onwards: breakdown

It did not last. From 7 July commercial ships in the strait were attacked, the United States resumed air strikes, and the truce collapsed. Reports in September spoke of new conditions passed between the two capitals through Qatar. Where matters stood in October was not established for this article.

⚠️ Read every claim about this war with care

Both sides in a war tell their own story, and both have told several. Casualty figures, the damage to nuclear sites, who broke which ceasefire and what was really agreed in June 2026 are all contested. This article has left out numbers and motives it could not check, and the account above rests largely on encyclopaedia pages that are themselves disputed. Treat it as an outline to be tested against the major news agencies, not as a settled record.

Pakistan’s part

For Pakistani readers this is not a distant quarrel.

Why Pakistan became the mediator

Few countries could have hosted those talks.

  • Pakistan shares a border of some 900 kilometres with Iran.
  • It has a close security relationship with Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states.
  • Its army chief and prime minister had built an unusually warm relationship with the American president during 2025.
  • It has a large Shia minority and could not afford to be seen taking sides against Iran.
  • And it had no wish to see a neighbour collapse into chaos on its western border, beside its own troubled province of Balochistan.

The Islamabad Talks did not produce an agreement. They did give Pakistan a diplomatic standing it had not enjoyed for decades, and the memorandum signed in June bore the capital’s name.

What the war has cost Pakistan

Effect How it reached Pakistan
Fuel prices Pakistan imports most of its oil through the Gulf
Inflation Back above 10 per cent by the summer of 2026, after two years of decline
Gas Deliveries from Qatar were cut when the strait closed
Remittances Millions of Pakistanis work in the Gulf states that came under attack
Growth The finance minister named the conflict among the reasons growth missed its target
The stock market Fell about a tenth from its January peak

What it has brought

  • Gwadar. With the strait unsafe, some shipping turned to ports outside it. Pakistan’s deep-water port, long almost idle, reported its busiest months.
  • Influence. Both Washington and Tehran needed Islamabad.

Iran and Pakistan: a neighbour’s history

The two countries’ relationship is older and more tangled than most Pakistanis realise.

  • 1947. Iran was the first country to recognise the new state of Pakistan.
  • The 1950s to the 1970s. Both were allies of the United States and partners in regional pacts. Iran helped Pakistan in its wars with India.
  • 1979. The revolution in Iran and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan pulled them apart. Pakistan drew closer to Saudi Arabia and the United States; Iran became their adversary.
  • The 1990s. They backed opposite sides in Afghanistan’s civil war.
  • The gas pipeline. For two decades a pipeline to carry Iranian gas to Pakistan has been planned, agreed and partly built on the Iranian side. Pakistan has not built its section, for fear of American sanctions.
  • The border. The frontier runs through the homeland of the Baloch people, who live on both sides. Each country has accused the other of sheltering militants who cross to attack. In January 2024 Iran struck what it said was a militant base inside Pakistan, and Pakistan struck back inside Iran two days later. Within a week the two had exchanged ambassadors again.
  • Everyday ties. Border districts of Balochistan buy Iranian fuel, food and even electricity. Tens of thousands of Pakistani pilgrims cross Iran each year on the way to shrines there and in Iraq.

So when war came to Iran, Pakistan’s position was awkward by design. It condemned the attacks on its neighbour. It did not break with Washington or Riyadh. And it offered its capital as the place where the two sides could meet.

How the strait works

The phrase “closing the Strait of Hormuz” appears in every account of this war. It is worth picturing.

The strait is the only sea exit from the Gulf. At its narrowest it is a little over thirty kilometres wide, with Iran on the northern shore and Oman on the southern. Ships keep to two lanes, one in and one out, each only a few kilometres across.

Through that gap, in normal times, pass the oil exports of Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Iran itself, and nearly all of Qatar’s gas. There are pipelines that bypass it, but they can carry only a fraction.

A country does not need a great navy to close such a passage. Mines, small fast boats, drones and missiles fired from the shore are enough to make insurers refuse cover, and a tanker without insurance does not sail. That is why a country far weaker than its enemies in the air could still shake the world’s economy, and why reopening the strait became the first item in every negotiation.

For Pakistan the arithmetic is direct. The fuel in its buses, the gas in its power stations and much of the money sent home by its workers all come from the far side of that gap.

What the March 2025 speech looks like now

It is tempting to read history backwards and call the speech a turning point. It was not. Iran went to the table weeks later. The talks failed for reasons larger than any one speech: the two governments wanted incompatible things, and one of America’s allies was determined to settle the matter by force.

But one line has aged in a way its author could not have intended. He warned that negotiating under pressure would bring more pressure. Iran negotiated, and the pressure came, and then the bombs. Whether refusing would have brought anything different is a question no one can answer.

✅ Key point

The story that began with “no talks under pressure” became, within a year, a major war, and it is not over. For Pakistan it has meant dearer fuel, a busier port and an unexpected seat at the table. The lesson most often drawn in Islamabad is an old one: a country that sits between larger powers does best when it can talk to all of them.

Who is who

Name Role
Ali Khamenei Supreme leader of Iran, 1989 to 2026
Mojtaba Khamenei His son and successor
Masoud Pezeshkian President of Iran
Abbas Araghchi Foreign minister of Iran; chief negotiator in 2025
Donald Trump President of the United States
JD Vance Vice-president; led the American side in Islamabad
Steve Witkoff American special envoy
Shehbaz Sharif Prime minister of Pakistan
Asim Munir Pakistan’s army chief
Ishaq Dar Pakistan’s foreign minister

Words used in this article

Term Plain meaning
Supreme leader The highest authority in Iran, above the president
Enrichment Processing uranium to make it usable as fuel or, at high levels, in a weapon
Sanctions Restrictions on trade and finance imposed to pressure a country
Snapback The clause that restored United Nations sanctions on Iran
Maximum pressure The American policy of severe sanctions on Iran
Strait of Hormuz The narrow sea passage at the mouth of the Gulf
Blockade The use of force to stop ships entering or leaving
Ceasefire An agreement to stop fighting, often temporary
Memorandum of understanding A written statement of what two sides intend to do
Mediator A third party that carries messages and proposals between two sides

Timeline

Date Event
2015 Nuclear agreement signed
2018 The United States withdraws
Early March 2025 President Trump writes to Ayatollah Khamenei
12 March 2025 The ayatollah rejects talks under pressure
12 April 2025 First talks, in Oman
13 to 24 June 2025 Twelve-day war
28 September 2025 United Nations sanctions return
26 February 2026 Talks in Geneva
28 February 2026 Strikes on Iran; Ayatollah Khamenei killed
8 March 2026 Mojtaba Khamenei named leader
Early April 2026 Ceasefire brokered by Pakistan
11 and 12 April 2026 Islamabad Talks
17 June 2026 Memorandum signed
7 July 2026 Memorandum begins to collapse

For how Pakistan’s own foreign policy is made, read our guide to Pakistan’s politics.

Follow the world from Pakistan's point of view

PoliticsPK explains who is who, how the system works and what changes, without the noise.

More in Politics Explained Politics Explained Latest from PoliticsPK

Frequently asked questions

❓ What did Iran’s leader say about talks with the United States in March 2025?

On 12 March 2025 Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the American offer of negotiations was a deception and that talking under threats would only increase the pressure of sanctions on Iran.

❓ Did Iran and the United States hold talks anyway?

Yes. Indirect talks began in Oman on 12 April 2025 and continued for several rounds. They ended without agreement in June 2025.

❓ What was the twelve-day war?

A conflict from 13 to 24 June 2025 in which Israel, and later the United States, bombed Iranian nuclear and military sites and Iran fired missiles and drones in return.

❓ Is Ayatollah Khamenei still Iran’s leader?

No. According to the sources used for this article he was killed in air strikes on 28 February 2026. His son Mojtaba Khamenei was named as his successor on 8 March 2026.

❓ What were the Islamabad Talks?

Negotiations between American and Iranian delegations held in Pakistan’s capital on 11 and 12 April 2026, with Pakistan as mediator. They ended without an agreement.

❓ Is there a peace deal?

A memorandum was signed on 17 June 2026 but began to break down in early July. The position after September 2026 was not established for this article.

❓ Why does the Strait of Hormuz matter?

About a fifth of the world’s oil, and much of its liquefied gas, passes through it. Closing it raises fuel prices everywhere.

❓ How has the conflict affected Pakistan?

Through higher fuel prices and inflation, disrupted gas supplies and risks to Pakistanis working in the Gulf. It has also raised Pakistan’s diplomatic profile and brought more traffic to Gwadar port.

❓ Why did Pakistan mediate?

It borders Iran, has close ties with the Gulf states and good relations with the United States, and has a strong interest in peace on its western border.

Sources